Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 December 11

< December 10	December 12 >

December 11

File:Tinashek 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tinashe Kachingwe has given me permission to use this picture under a free license. is not a valid permission. Not eligible for transfer to Commons either. Hedwig in Washington ^(TALK) 05:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just tag such things with {{subst:npd}} rather than bringing them here. The user warning for it provides the uploader with specific steps they can take to resolve the issue. --B (talk) 12:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Agree with B, next time something similar appears better to tag it with {{subst:npd}}. Salavat (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Original Mountaineer Field.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this image is [1] whose image description page is at [2]. The problem with the "not renewed" tag is that we have no idea whether it was ever published to begin with. [3] says that Fairchild went out of business in 1965 so most likely they did not renew any copyrights they had. But this being public domain is predicated on it having been published at some point. If we can't find evidence that it is public domain, it would not qualify for fair use since [4] and [5] (possibly among other yearbooks at [6] have pictures of the stadium. It would be nice to find a PD aerial somewhere though ... B (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CJ Santos at the SM North EDSA Skydome.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing evidence of permission. Please follow the instructions at WP:DCP if you are the copyright holder -FASTILY 01:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is claimed to be released under a CC BY-SA 4.0 but there is insufficient evidence. Thepermission link as of this nomination states "Photo of CJ Santos released under a free license." but with no specifics about the license. Whpq (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source page has been updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalaboomsky (talk • contribs) 05:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kalaboomsky: Is this an official site or a fan-created/user-created site where anyone can upload files? Normally, the preferred procedure for things like this is for the COPYRIGHT HOLDER to send a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org using the form found at WP:CONSENT. If the person sending the email is not the photographer, they need to explain how they became the copyright holder. This website looks like the same interface as flickr - is it an offshoot of flickr? Content from user-generated sites isn't usually trusted because anyone can sign up for an account. --B (talk) 13:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.