Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragons of Camelot
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- Scott (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dragons of Camelot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. It exists, sure, but not notable. Not even able to find reviews that are not coming from blogs. References in the article are a primary source and a review which does not even go in depth about the movie per WP:SIGCOV. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 06:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 06:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.