User talk:Cards84664
|
|
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{talkback|Cards84664}} on your talk. Note: Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you. |
Threads are archived manually in groups of 50. |
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
|
Hello Cards84664, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
A Red Cherry (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Manchester Avenue station for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchester Avenue station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester Avenue station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — C16SH (speak up) 04:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Reverts on NICTD articles
Please join the discussion at Template talk:Adjacent stations#Only showing headers once and consider reverting yourself. S-rail-next is helpful, but not essential, and not a great reason to revert in my opinion. Mackensen (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Please fix rail articles
In {{Infobox station}}, |other_services= is described as follows: other_services: Allows inclusion of the s-rail/s-line boxes for former and/or future services. (Do not use {{s-start}} and {{s-end}} templates.).
At Springhurst railway station and a dozen other articles, you introduced incorrectly nested tables (visible on the error list here) by not following these instructions. Please fix. Here's the list, as far as I can tell:
- Springhurst railway station
- Beaufort railway station, Victoria
- Stratford railway station, Victoria
- Traralgon railway station
- Morwell railway station
- Moe railway station
- Clarkefield railway station
- Castlemaine railway station
- Echuca railway station
- Eaglehawk railway station
- Maryborough railway station, Victoria
- Heathcote Junction railway station
- Tallarook railway station
- Shepparton railway station
Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) @Jonesey95: Fixed, I think. Jc86035 (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Jc86035: Thanks. Elegantly done. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Stop Reverting!
Please stop reverting everything I do for no or invalid reasons. If it happens again I will be reporting you. Thanks - Peterjack1
Unexplained reverts
Please clarify why you are reverting my edits. I’m not the same user who was on this IP in October, but I see it was blocked for a massive edit war, and I wasn’t going to go that far... however I want to know why you are reverting my perfectly legitimate edits, and why you also reinstated vandalism that I removed in this edit. 24.34.85.169 (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)