Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liv Warfield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Clpo13 (talk | contribs) at 20:43, 23 January 2019 (Liv Warfield: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus after two relists appears to be in favor of keeping the article on the strength of the sources provided during discussion. clpo13(talk) 20:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Liv Warfield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Needs evidence of meeting WP:MUSICBIO: There are hints of notability from what links here, but the article is the kind of self-conscious promo bio that usually indicates someone trying a lot harder on Wikipedia than a notable performer needs to. Closeapple (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 12:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs assesment of the sources Michig posted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.