This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AndrewRichmo(talk | contribs) at 03:10, 25 January 2019(Suggestion for changes to "Controversies" section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:10, 25 January 2019 by AndrewRichmo(talk | contribs)(Suggestion for changes to "Controversies" section)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
There are a few problems in the "Controversies" section. The most glaring was this sentence, which I removed: "Throughout his review, he repeatedly denied that whites ever sought to control black bodies -- as if slavery never existed in America." That isn't supported by the cited source (https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/race-and-opportunity). In fact, Cherry doesn't make that claim once, let alone repeatedly, in the article. Another issue is that the rest of the section includes no actual sources suggesting that there was controversy over anything; it's just a list of things Cherry has said. The section should either be updated to include sources supporting the claim that there was a controversy over the claims it mentions, or else the claim that those articles were controversial should be deleted (which would mean deleting the "Controversies" section). This goes for the National Affairs article as well; I removed the false claim but there are still no citations to suggest the article was controversial, as the heading of that section suggests. (I should add that I haven't reviewed one of the sources, the National Economic Association one, because the link takes me to a login page that I can't log into. Maybe that source, when the link is updated, will include evidence that there was some controversy over the relevant issues, but it looks unlikely, since from the title it appears to be just another article written by him, not a report on a controversy surrounding his views, or an actual example of controversy arising about his views, or etc.) If the sources can't be updated the section should be deleted, but I won't delete it myself right away, since if it was properly sourced -- and if it was revised to only make claims that are supported by its sources -- the section would be informative and relevant.