User talk:HoAHabesha
HoAHabesha, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi HoAHabesha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC) |
December 2018
Hello, I'm Turtlewong. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yohannes IV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Turtlewong (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
I shot you a reply, mate
Talk:Cushitic peoples
I might as well add when I'm here anyway; that I find eurocentric viewpoints annoying myself. But that's the nature of an English-speaking board, friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusIbr (talk • contribs) 21:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Ethio-semites are not Cushitic.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.219.188.51 (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
These are FALSE ACCUSATIONS made by Anonymous user 84.219.188.51 (that doses not have an account),
Ok. Let’s see if we can talk this out in the talk page.
Talk:Cushitic peoples — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.219.188.51 (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Here are some good genetics and linguistics blog posts by a Somali geneticist
They’re extremely high quality and the guy seems generally unbiased though he sometimes(not too often) jumps to conclusions made by other geneticists. Though sometimes, he makes a good argument against.. They contain references you might like as well, friend, along with super-interesting content. I suggest his entire blog in fact.
http://anthromadness.blogspot.com/2015/07/horn-africans-mixture-between-east.html?m=0
http://anthromadness.blogspot.com/2017/08/being-more-accurate-about-substrates-in.html?m=0 (He calls Cushitic “Erythraeic”(the old Greek name for the region) in this blog post because he dislikes the biblical connotations apparently)