User talk:Mariogoods

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mariogoods! You created a thread called Question about works without official translation at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mariogoods! You created a thread called Question about a Chinese channel's program at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mariogoods! You created a thread called Question about Source from IAD at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any sources or references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mariogoods/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mariogoods/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mariogoods! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mariogoods. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yang Yongxin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weibo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help improve and copy edit for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Futhuy (talk) 02:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but my English is not good enough for a copy edit. Mariogoods (talk) 02:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject order

Hi, I noticed you've been changing the order of Wikiproject banners on a lot of talk pages (I noticed one, and then saw in your contribs you've done a lot more). Is there any particular reason you're doing this? It doesn't appear to be particularly helpful. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I change the order of Wikiproject mostly for "cleaning" the order by my standard (I'm sorry) so that it looks more logical. It also benefits further clean up such as adding and removing certain banners. If it is unnesserary, I will try to stop it. Thank you! (Please don't mind my poor English) Mariogoods (talk) 03:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Wall of China: Documentary

TV Movie 2007, Discovery Channel, National Geographic. The protagonist is Qi Jiguang, an historical character. Geng Zhou, one of his soldiers, and Chang Ang, the Mongol military leader, are historical or fictional? Please, can you help me to find more details abot them if they are historical and edit it in Talk:Qi Jiguang? Thank you! --79.16.239.14 (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found no information about Geng Zhou and Chang Ang. Almost all the academic paper is talking about Qi's influence. But I have read History of Ming and found that there is no content mentioned Geng Zhou's existence. However, I can't decide it, too.Mariogoods (talk) 13:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know very well this documentary, you can see the full video (Part 1, Part 2) and then search also in Chinese sites or documents (as this). Their names can also be changed with other historical characters related with Qi Jiguang. Here Geng Zhou is renamed Zhou Li. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.180.136.246 (talk) 15:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geng Zhou

Geng Zhou was probably a fictional character, but in this documentary he is the second main protagonist after Qi Jiguang, then he could have an own page. Please, can you help me, because I'm too busy? Thank you! --87.4.239.213 18:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.4.239.213 (talk) [reply]