Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Chang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Chang[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTINHERIT; The article was created by an undisclosed paid editor and I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and there is no evidence to support his independent notability. Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have also nominated Kingman Group for deletion which has even less claim to notability. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- Arthur Chang is very clearly notable, founder of Kingman Group, Spyder Paintball, Kingman Training, Raven USA and Java Gear. Produced three movies (two have wiki pages) under his own banner Kingman Films International. Looks like nominator doesn't have an idea if there are not enough sources still a person can be notable. 157.47.139.29 (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC) — 157.47.139.29 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep - Did nom look for more sources before nominating this as AfD? From my searches, Chang passes WP:GNG at least and several other notability criteria as well. Skirts⁸⁹ 20:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Skirts89: Voting without sources are useless so can you please provide some soruces to support your claim? GSS (talk|c|em) 03:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Actually, the onus is on the nominator to search for sources before going the AfD route. Let's build some consensus on this and use the appropriate process. Skirts⁸⁹ 15:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination happend after my WP:BEFORE search and being a responsible participant you need to provide some reliable sources to support your claim above. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:42, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noting for the record that (per their contribution history [1] and per a concern raised at User_talk:Skirts89#Please) that Skirts89 was voting in one AfD per minute in the time before and after joining this discussion. SamHolt6 (talk) 01:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seem to be a non-notable businessman/producer. The subject has not accrued the necessary level of coverage in reliable, in-depth, independent sources required to meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO; noting that passing mentions in relation to companies or awards Arthur Chang was involved with do not confer undue notability on Chang per WP:NOTINHERITED.--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Deletre - very much a run of the mill business person. Film producers are so common that their articles are almost always deleted at AfD. Bearian (talk) 01:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and procedural close - Agree with SamHolt6, his business could be notable but Chang is not at the moment. To establish notability, required sources are definitely not there at the moment. Delete and close AFD.157.47.219.95 (talk) 23:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.