User talk:Thescholarlyinsight

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Respectful Productions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Respectful Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AD ^Talk 15:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Banned in Boise

The article Banned in Boise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NWEB.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 12:26, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ethan Levy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethan Levy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Levy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 01:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of STW Talent Agency

The article STW Talent Agency has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable and not notable company. Having one notable actor doesn't inherently make a talent agency notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 03:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thescholarlyinsight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

With all due respect DMACKS, I am genuinely trying to contribute to the Wikipedia database. I am only adding facts to the database, therefore, I am unsure what your issue is. Wikipedia is utilized to help find information on those within various industries, yes? I'd like for you to reconsider your decision for I am sincerely trying to do good.

Decline reason:

You are promoting various non-notable entities and people, including yourself. That's not doing good, at least not from Wikipedia's point of view. Huon (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which has articles about subjects covered in independent reliable sources that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Please explain your relationship to STW Talent Agency. 331dot (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Thescholarlyinsight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24616 was submitted on Apr 05, 2019 12:44:08.

Notes:

If you are the blocked user, an administrator will find your request on UTRS and should email you shortly. Please do not request additional unblocks. Tickets may take 24-48 hours to process. Tickets will expire after 1 week if you have not responded via the web interface to any emails from the reviewing administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages are not usually deleted as a whole. In addition, declined unblock requests cannot be removed while the block is in effect; you may remove other content if you wish, but those must remain. 331dot (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]