Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Henry Lesch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. --Randykitty (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

George Henry Lesch

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one only has one reference. Being president of and CEO of Colgate-Palmolive is certainly a big deal, but without *multiple* independent sources, I don't think he is sufficient notable. Happy if you prove me wrong. --David Tornheim (talk) 09:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - added a few books and web sources. Believe there would be more "print sources" out there pre-internet era. Pass GNG. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:39, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:39, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets general notability criteria, secondary sources available. Spyder212 (talk) 20:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which secondary sources? All I see is the one New York Times Obit. We need at least one more. I don't understand how footnotes 3 and 4 of this version are reliable for the subject or add to notability. I don't even see where either mention the subject. Maybe I am missing something. Are they the correct links? --David Tornheim (talk) 02:21, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He was the chairman and CEO of a major corporation for well over a decade, plus a New York Times obituary practically establishes notability all on its own. His heyday was in the pre-internet era, so it's not too surprising that online sources are scarce. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty more reliable secondary sources are available here. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That convinces me. I can withdraw now if anyone requests. I do agree with everyone that there should be plenty of WP:RS on him. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would requst that you withdraw. I don't think there's any point in continuing this discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Do you have the link with the instructions? I saw it recently. I know it is speedy keep. Just now sure where it is. I will look. --David Tornheim (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I found it here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal) --David Tornheim (talk) 19:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A true captain of industry, as President and CEO of one of the best-known companies in history for over 13 years. Wikipedia is not limited to a google search: business moguls are notable even if they retired before 1995. Even on-internet sources, if one expands their search past google, are considerable. For instance, a search of newspapers.com comes up with a large number of articles with significant coverage of Lesch's actions as the head of C-P. Lesch easily meets GNG.Jacona (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
keep I am surprised there aren't more references, but his CEO days were pre-internet. CEO of a very major corporation and I have to believe he received plenty of coverage during that time. Forbes cover and NYT obit confirm notability.Sandals1 (talk) 17:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.