Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brook Valley Country Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brook Valley Country Club

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable country club PR-piece with nothing more than WP:MILL coverage and hyper local mentions. Being on land once owned by someone famous isn't in itself notable, as I'm pretty sure everything in existence would be if we used that as a measure. Praxidicae (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is slightly more unusual to find land in the US that can be traced to a reigning British monarch a decade before American independence. However, I find the claim "In 1760 the land was part of a royal grant given to King Charles" somewhat odd, since Charles II of England died 75 years earlier. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing notable from a golf point of view. Just routine content like any other golf course. Nigej (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable golf course....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough to warrant a wikipedia page. Also, are the specifics of electronic devices within the Boardroom really nessecary? Cheesy McGee (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.