Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Ranger (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like WP:ANYBIO #1 is claimed to be met, with no dissent Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rami Ranger

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3rd nom of borderline WP:NBIO. There are few sources that give impression of in-depth if short coverage, like [1], [2], or slightly edited WP:INTERVIEWS like [3], but IMHO they are effectively rewritten press releases. I do not see any in-depth coverage in a source that can be seen as properly independent (not paid for by the subject, or not based on materials submitted by the subject). Then there's a bunch of local / minor national honors and awards that are not sufficient for showing 'significant impact'. PS. And not surprisingly, the creator of this bio is a WP:SPA and possibly the subject himself, User:Dr Rami Ranger... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Being named a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) is probably an indication of notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:34, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The subject is a person of good reputation and is a public figure in the UK. The CBE is certainly an honour conferred by the Queen for a high level of service to the nation. It should remain and not be deleted as an initial point of informnation for anyone trying to understand the subject person. This should not be deleted. ([User talk: harmeetahuja|tal]) 17:13 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment. If there is consensus that CBE is sufficient for WP:ANYBIO#1 I will withdraw this nom. Please ping me if there are any indications of such consensus and I am not active here. TIA. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please see the following link acknowledging the award/honour and its status.. The CBE is one of the highest awards in UK society. In addtion, the subject person owns and is chairman of the only company to have been awarded the Queen's Award for Enterprise in International Trade for 5 consecutve years, a British business record and has enduring historical significance as a result. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commander_(order) [User talk: harmeetahuja|talk])14:16 20th May
Keep. We have always held a CBE or above to be notable per WP:ANYBIO #1. There is substantial precedent for this. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.