Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentech Practice Management Software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spearmint210 (talk | contribs) at 14:26, 24 May 2019 (→‎Dentech Practice Management Software). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Dentech Practice Management Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current article content is sourced to a wiki and a press release. I've been unable to find significant coverage in independent sources to demonstrate notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC) More sources have been added to the page. Let me know what other improvements you think should be made.[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I found coverage of other businesses named "Dentech", but none that corresponds to this company or its software. — Newslinger talk 08:57, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do NOT Delete There are other companies around the world called Dentech or a version of the name, that should not disregard the fact that the company is a legit dental software company operating in the United State since the late 1970's. Perhaps searching Dentech dental practice management software or just dental practice management software would give better results.
  • Delete Even being the first of something doesn't matter if reliable independent secondary sources do not take notice of that contribution. As this entry lacks that coverage it is not notable. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]