User talk:Muhandes

TUSC token e80b809c8cc344eed212d9db46506234

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Stop this Edit War ! This is a warning from my side

What sources you want me to put ? I have put in factually correct data with references attached to it .Verify the facts on your own and stop this edit war ,because it is of no use as I will revert your edits again and if you are so much devoted towards improving Wikipedia then why don't you attach more references on your own after researching a bit on the facts I have put it  ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.95.165.21 (talk) 06:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Dear anonymous. You should read WP:BRD before talking about edit warring. You added material, that's being Bold. I Reverted since I think it is inappropriate. Now we Discuss. By re-reverting the edit, it is you who are edit warring and behaving disruptively, not me. --Muhandes (talk) 08:21, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

The data I have put in is factually correct ,you may change the way the data appears(i.e. the language) but there's no point in deleting the data again and again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.95.164.57 (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear anonymous. You did not read WP:BRD as I suggested. You added material, that's being Bold. I Reverted since I think it is inappropriate. Now we Discuss. By re-reverting the edit, it is you who are edit warring and behaving disruptively, not me. It may be that some of what you say is correct, but by edit warring and behaving disruptively you are not giving your ideas a chance to be heard. The place to discuss these changes is the article's talk page. You are wasting your breath on my talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 17:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Infobox India university ranking

Hi Muhandes. Would you mind taking a look at the {{Infobox India university ranking}} template being used in SRM Institute of Science and Technology#Rankings? When you open the edit window for that section, there are a number of parameters being flagged as "unknown", but the template still seems to be working. I think it has to do with the year added onto the end of the parameters since the template only seems to want the latest values being used. Since you've been editing that template, I thought you might know why this is happening. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: You got it exactly right, this is by design. Since consensus is that when a newer ranking exists, older ones should not be used, but on the other hand, making the citations invalid will violate WP:V, the decision was made to only show editors that there is a problem, without influencing the article. --Muhandes (talk) 20:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Def will ask if any issues

R.Kaps (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Request you to re-look at edits reverted

Hi, you have reverted many of my edits. I understand they might sound too positive as they are taken from university official websites. You remove details of programs offered as it violates your policy which I didn't notice.

However, I request you to re-look at the rankings sections, history section and general introduction section of my edits because they do not even have any tones. They are written in general objective tone. All information is available in public domain on university websites themselves and also there is no way to paraphrase such things and also things like vision, mission and values. I don't know why accreditation sections are also removed. University being recognized by a statutory authority or private body is very general information like for example UGC recognition or AICTE approvals etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by One692 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

One692 - Looking through your contributions (as well as what you stated here), you appear to be adding content by copying it straight from external websites and sources. This is not allowed and is a serious violation of Wikipedia's policies on copyright. Repeated copyright violations can result in being blocked from editing. Please add content by entering it using your own words. Even close paraphrasing (where you copy and paste content from somewhere else and then just change a few key words and phrases) is not okay; you need to use your own words and cite sources wherever you use a source to add the content. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Couldn't have said it better, thanks for stalking. --Muhandes (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Some pussy for you!

Yeah, I got the memo! ...I forget to cite sometimes, my bad! (~ I sound so passive aggressive right now, XD).

Chartcrave (talk) 20:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

I'd revert much more If I knew I'd get a kitten. --Muhandes (talk) 11:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your edit on pgimer

The reversion of edit on pgimer is pretty bad. You should check the NIRF ranking by yourself. Why should you revert a fact? Do you have Ulterior motives? Thumbs down. Vishnudev01 (talk) 07:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Nirf is a government survery which determines ranking of institutions based on certain parameters. And i am pretty sure you donot bekong to medical fraternity. So kindly stop being a know-it-all and stop undoing good edits. Vishnudev01 (talk) 07:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

https://www.nirfindia.org/2019/MedicalRanking.html

The government of India ranking of medical institutions, for your info.

Vishnudev01 (talk) 07:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

See the harvard medical school page.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Medical_School

They have told it as tbe best institution in tbe world and has not even quoted any official survery. If you are wary of my edit being a promotional gimmick(which I dont need as PGI is a government institute), go edit the Harvard Page too. Vishnudev01 (talk) 07:20, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@Vishnudev01: Please stop edit warring, see WP:BRD. You made an edit which I reverted. Restoring the edit without discussion is disruptive.

Regarding motives, I think my list of contributions speaks for itself. I have made many thousands of edits to education in India articles including developing {{Infobox India university ranking}}, which is used in almost every single one of them. But since you asked, you made me wonder about your motives. You already hinted that you are a member of the "medical fraternity", but are you related in any way to Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research? You did not edit any other similar article. I have clearly stated my alma mater at my user page. Before throwing mud at other people, you should try to be as open.

Regarding the edit itself, the ranking is already listed in the article. The consensus for education in India articles is that listing it in the lead is promotional. See also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Further discussion on how to improve the article should take place at the article's talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 07:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

EIILM University

Hi Muhandes i actually made the changes as they were incorrect as per my knowledge and as i was'nt aware about the procedures for the same i would like to discuss on the same my mail id is [no] kindly let me know to correct the same as your misleading information is harming a lot of futures which are on stake because of of your wrong info — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitbangwal (talk • contribs) 14:26, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sumitbangwal: I'm not sure what changes to EIILM University you are referring to, since you made no edits with account before. Some changes were made before by some anonymous editors, but none were properly sourced, so they were reverted. If you want to discuss any changes, try the article's talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Who the hell are you why should we talk to you, it is you who is provioding a misleading information and everytime we correct it you make changes to that you tell me what time you want to discuss don't just revert our changes and go for vacation as your page always says you're on vacation you want to discuss come over for a discussion we're ready for it what are you getting of it by providing a misleading info and a fake propeganda none your sources are valid none of your sources have a credibility we are providing all the info present on HRDDSIKKIM official portal, you evrytime provide ranking and media houses links they don't have any credibility in our system go for UGC, HRDDSIKKIM and then start this edit war as we'll also revert as many times you edit our changes if you have any doubts get a clarification from us otherwise mind your own business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitbangwal (talk • contribs) 12:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sumitbangwal: Please be civil, I can guarantee that cursing will get you nowhere. If you wish to contribute to Wikipedia you will have to follow its guidelines. Please read WP:BRD carefully to understand the real situation. You were making changes to the article, this is called being Bold. I am questioning your changes, this is called Reverting. We now Discuss the changes. If you keep repeating your edits, this is disruptive editing, and if you keep doing it, you will be blocked. You have now also clarified that you have a conflict of interests so you should not edit the article at all. Please make suggestions at the article's talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 13:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

you only made us the way e are reverting to you go ahead discuss what you wantb tyo discuss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitbangwal (talk • contribs) 13:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

@Sumitbangwal: Please stop editing the article and make your suggestions at the article's talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 13:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

those sourced articles your providing are from media houses and i'm providing links you from HRDDSIKKIM what credibility your sources have brefore reverting to my changes have you confirmed my info