User talk:Useddenim

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Hm.

Are you what happens when I'm done with it? - Denimadept (talk) 03:40, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

😂 Useddenim (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ISO 3166 adj

Template:ISO 3166 adj has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template : Brecon and Merthyr Railway

You were a great help some time ago with regards the incorporation of items on this template and that only left one main query that our team were working on, which we have now solved. There is a very detailed area map titled "The Rhymney Railway 1871" on a Wikipedia article elsewhere which incorporated all other railways in different colours, but clearly shows the line of the Brecon and Merthyr Railway as one of those railways.

The two stations concerned are those of Aber Bargoed and Bargoed Colliery Halt on the Template : Brecon and Merthyr Railway. These two stations need to be moved from their current position on the template upwards, so they follow on immediately after Cwmsyfiog Halt. Looking at the current line template. the Bargoed line at the extreme right, where the two stations above were on, should not have the station icon mark of Bargoed, as currently shown, as the line in question passed to the right of that station area with no connection.

Such are the very convoluted computer changes that are required to effect these corrections, that once again, your kind offices are called upon to perform these tasks.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 03:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Useddenim (talk) 04:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AMT Station

Template:AMT Station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia line template printing query

Whenever I need to print a hard-copy A4 print-out of any Wikipedia line templates, in the vast majority of cases, everything is fine, but there are certain ones such as Template : Oxted Line which when printed out, show a propensity for many blank white spaces to appear between entries on the template print-out and I wonder if recent changes to the computer format is the reason why this should occur.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's because it used the obsolete {{Railway line header}}/{{BS-header}}/{{BS-table}} templates instead of {{Routemap}}. It has now been updated. Useddenim (talk) 16:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

help

how to add other cities in Template:Rail-interchange/doc/IN Saha ( talk ) 09:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Arnabsaha2212: Make your request (with {{edit template-protected}} ) at Template talk:Rail-interchange. Useddenim (talk) 13:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Useddenim: is it necessary to request like other users with the specific format? Saha ( talk ) 13:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some Template editors insist on it; others don't. Useddenim (talk) 13:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Useddenim: i have posted it. plzz check... :) Saha ( talk ) 13:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Metro Transit station

Template:Metro Transit station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 13:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eglinton station (disambiguation)

Hi there... are you planning to move the Toronto station to Eglinton station (Toronto) (which I don't think should be done)? Because otherwise your latest edit on the DAB page is wrong, as we would list the primary topic first, like the way it was before your edit, no, as per WP:DABPRIMARY? —Joeyconnick (talk) 16:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but Queen station (and possibly others) should probably all be dealt with at the same time. Useddenim (talk) 17:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So unless consensus is reached on moving Eglinton, I'll revert you as it shouldn't be in an intermediate state that makes it seem as if that potential move is a done deal. As for any move itself, and any for Queen "and possibly others", might I suggest doing those as RMs? —Joeyconnick (talk) 17:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, an RM/RfC was my intention. Useddenim (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template : Rhymney Railway

Having now completed my researches, I would like you to amend this template to include the following. At the left hand side of the template, you will note the line of the Quakers Yard and Merthyr Railway, commencing with Abercanaid. In a downwards direction from there, the following three stops should be entered onto the template:-

Between Abercanaid and Troed-y-Rhiw Halt, add... Gethin Pit Platform and Castle Pit Platform

Between Aberfan and Pontygwaith Halt, add... Merthyr Vale Miners Platform

Such is the very convoluted computer work involved, far too involved for my meagre skills in that respect, that I ask you to be so kind as to do these inclusions on the template

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 08:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Xenophon Philosopher:

Done. Now you have some station articles to write… Useddenim (talk) 14:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grateful thanks for this, as it makes more complete reading now regarding the Quakers Yard and Merthyr Railway in terms of completeness. With regards to articles, there were already station entries (in red) without articles on those stations prior to my researches into what already had been entered in topography section quite some time ago, so I suppose the person who did this would already have such articles on their "to do" list.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template : Preston and Longridge Railway RDT

Just over a week ago, you kindly dealt with my query concerning "white extra line spaces" on Template : Oxted Line when printed out and you explained matters. The very same problem has now arisen when attempting to take a hard-copy print of Template : Preston and Longridge Railway RDT, so can I beg your assistance again to correct this particular template.

Incidentally, why are the dates spread over two lines against each line entry, when a single line would suffice.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 17:05, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Useddenim (talk) 03:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whittingham Hospital Railway

Thanks for creating {{Whittingham Hospital Railway RDT}}. Note that the "accommodation bridge" should be a bridge over, not a bridge under. Also at Brabiner Lane there was a bridge over the lane, not a level crossing. The bridge over Blundell Brook was south (not north) of this. For a detailed OS map, see https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15&lat=53.8149&lon=-2.6444&layers=168&b=1 . Thanks! -- Dr Greg talk 19:47, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thank you for the corrections. There's only so much that can be gleaned from Google's satellite view. Useddenim (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of content

Please desist from removing content, as you have done at articles such as Template:Manchester and Leeds Railway Template:Crewe–Liverpool line Template:Liverpool, Crosby and Southport Railway Template:Liverpool to Wigan Line Template:Edinburgh to Bathgate Line Template:Liverpool to Wigan Line