User talk:Useddenim/Archive 10

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Useddenim! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 21:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bakerloo line extension via New Cross RDT

Template:Bakerloo line extension via New Cross RDT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bakerloo line extension via Peckham Rye RDT

Template:Bakerloo line extension via Peckham Rye RDT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bakerloo line extension via Camberwell RDT

Template:Bakerloo line extension via Camberwell RDT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help for smoothening curves & making the Template:Kolkata Circular Railway

Hello, Good to see you active after a long time. I updated this template Template:Kolkata Circular Railway with the latest data and have made it look good to the best of my abilities. However I believe that it can be made more "circular" and even better. Especially the spaces on the right side as the columns increased. Can you please have a look & check it when you have time ? Thanks GoldenDragon2293Return (talk) 02:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw the sandbox you are working on. Thank you for the help. This is just an FYI. Have made a small update to the template as a route was missing. Thanks again. GoldenDragon2293Return (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PCC fleet

Template:PCC fleet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:VSB station

Template:VSB station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BTS color/doc

Template:BTS color/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jjpachano (talk) 12:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Smarts

Template:Smarts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:M-Line

Template:M-Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assist with VTA Blue Line

Hey Useddenim, I updated Template:Blue Line (VTA) to show the proper exit/entrances to the freeway median, but for the life of me, I can't figure out how to get the geometry right for the exits to the right. Would you mind giving me an assist with this? --RickyCourtney (talk) 21:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RickyCourtney: Done. I also changed all the stations to

(udBHF) for consistent symbol size. Useddenim (talk) 02:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great, thank you! --RickyCourtney (talk) 04:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MTs

Template:MTs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SLML

Template:SLML has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Passenger Lines of North East Lincolnshire

Passenger lines of
North East Lincolnshire

East Halton

Immingham West Jn

Humber Road Jn

'Admiralty' station

Ulceby North Jn

Dock Entrance

Immingham

Eastern Jetty

Hello: here's a blast from the past!

After some years of ill health and disillusion with Wikipedia I'm dipping my toe in again.

An authoritative work by Paul King ("The Railways of N E Lincolnshire, Part 2: Stations" pub. 2019) has convinced me that a station existed in the area which I had never heard of.

It was built at the request of the Admiralty and existed from 1917 to c1922. No physical traces remain on the ground.

It had two platforms and a booking office and was every bit as bona fide a station as the WW2 Ulceby Aerodrome Platform.

The bad news from a route diagram design point of view is that it was sited between Ulceby Aerodrome Platform and Humber Road Junction. I fear this will necessitate a significant rejig of that part of the route diagram.

I have worked out a paper and pencil design which would not lose any of the wonderful detail you built in, notably the junction names (Ulceby North Jct, Humber Rd Jct and Immingham West Jct) but don't have the skills to implement it.

Could I ask you if you would please take on the rejig?

I'm pleased that Mr King's substantial work doesn't add any other stations or contradict anything we already have.

Kind regards

Dave DavidAHull (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

@DavidAHull: Apologies for not noticing (and replying) sooner, but I too was taking a hiatus from Wikipedia for a while. Is the diagram above what you had in mind? Useddenim (talk) 02:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for replying and for acting so promptly. The station is exactly where you have put it. Its name was Eastfield Road. I will set about writing an article when I see it open to the public, so to speak!

Kind regards

Dave

Done! Useddenim (talk) 16:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need help on a icon - 2 branches + suburban parallel

Hi Useddenim. Hope you are doing well.

I need your help with 2 issues related to templates using the Park Circus station.

First problem

Please refer the Template:Calcutta Chord link line template. There was a branch line for Berucks and Comens that was present that used to join just before the station according to the 1944-45 map for Bengal Assam railway. While it has been easier to add it in this template and in the Template:Sealdah South section as you can see in Park Circus Template 1:

Park Circus Template 1

Beruck & Comens Siding

3

7

Park Circus

Sealdah South section

this has not been the case in the below templates (kind of how it appears in Park Circus Template 2):

Template:Sealdah Main and North section
Template:Sealdah–Ranaghat–Gede line
Template:Kolkata Circular Railway (especially difficult in this one)

I am unable to put this in the same row as from where the Kankurgachi chord line emerges so I have to put it in a separate row. It doesn't look good.

Park Circus Template 2



					Beruck & Comens Siding
				11	Park Circus
					Sealdah South section


					Beruck & Comens Siding
				11	Park Circus
					Sealdah South section

While in template 1 the Kankurgachi branch unnecessarily takes up 1 extra row due to the bridge it looks good with the defunct Beruck & Comens siding branch from the same origin. In template 2 the Kankurgachi branching looks good but I am unable to put it in the same row.

Second problem

Park Circus is actually not a junction station. So the Kankuragchi branch joining up at Park Circus is not correct technically. It has a platform at the same location but the line merges with the Sealdah South line after crossing the park circus station. So what I am visualizing is something like this in Template 3:

Park Circus Template 3

Beruck & Comens Siding

3

7

Park Circus

Sealdah South section

Beruck & Comens Siding

3│7

Park Circus

Sealdah South section

Problem is:

How do I do this with parallel icons ?
The suburban station overlays are lacking for parallel and big icons. Is there a need to create new icon here then ?

Hoping to get your expertise on this matter.

Regards, GoldenDragon2293Return (talk) 06:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GoldenDragon2293Return: I trust the one of the revisions in Template 2 or Template 3 will work? Useddenim (talk) 16:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Useddenim: Thanks a lot. Template 3 is exactly what I want but I am kind of struggling to get this placed right as you can see here: User:GoldenDragon2293Return/sandbox . (I am really sorry but I really suck at dealing with half width icons even after dealing with this stuff for years now) GoldenDragon2293Return (talk) 17:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Caracas Metro color

Template:Caracas Metro color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DHL

Template:DHL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tower City station

Template:Tower City station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Venezuela rail transport color templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Venezuela rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Porto Metro

Template:Porto Metro has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TransPennine North West

Template:TransPennine North West has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Transport for London lines

Template:Transport for London lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gauteng Rail color

Template:Gauteng Rail color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Israel Rail color

Template:Israel Rail color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:IRTE

Template:IRTE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:IRTNL

Template:IRTNL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bang Na Expressway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bang Pakong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cts

Template:Cts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:43, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Istanbul mass transit color

Template:Istanbul mass transit color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kolkata Circular Railway/sandbox

Hello, Useddenim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kolkata Circular Railway/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need help on the Template:Howrah–Barddhaman main line

Hello. Hope you are doing well. I have updated the Template:Howrah–Barddhaman main line template recently with the latest info however the lines around Howrah being too complicated, I believe the template can look better. Especially as it's difficult to figure out the route a passenger train takes on the journey to & from it. For the being I have marked the route a passenger takes using the NULg icon but it's making the route look like it's broken, so I would not like to use it ideally.

I request your help to smoothen the template out. Please check it out when you have time.

Regards, GoldenDragon2293Return (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jakarta color

Template:Jakarta color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 01:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:IrishRail Color

Template:IrishRail Color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Malaysia rail transport color templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Malaysia rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Useddenim

Maybe you didn't read the notice that states Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. If the tagged category is no longer empty, another editor can remove the tag. There are plenty of editors who patrol the category of empty categories and remove tags from ones that now contain pages.

If another page you created gets tagged for speedy deletion, please do not remove the tag from the page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Enough of the wikilawyering; just admit you made a mistake and let it go. Useddenim (talk) 04:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chennai Suburban color

Template:Chennai Suburban color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ireland rail transport color templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Ireland rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korea rail transport color templates

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korea rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Paris Metro/Station

Template:Paris Metro/Station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada rail transport color templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Philippines rail transport color templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Philippines rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RER/Station

Template:RER/Station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SIR station

Template:SIR station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SNCF

Template:SNCF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wandle Park–Therapia Lane

Template:Wandle Park–Therapia Lane has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:München bahnhof

Template:München bahnhof has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

When you extract text into a new template, could you please check the links used? The two templates of today had links to respectively 15 and 8 (with a few multiple times) different disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 10:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; however, your issue should be with Trinaliv who made the wholesale cut 'n' paste copies of the original PT:WP diagrams with no cleanup whatsoever. (He has been asked to clean up his mess, but seems to have ignored that request.) I do use the [Review link] popup when it appears, but for whatever reason that tool doesn't seem to be working reliably. Useddenim (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still you created the templates. The Banner talk 14:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kms

Template:Kms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Railway bridge (disambiguation)/sandbox

Hello Useddenim,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Railway bridge (disambiguation)/sandbox for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xx236 (talk) 08:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Xx236: Thanks. I guess I forgot to put the {{Db-g7}} tag on it. Useddenim (talk) 11:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Railway bridge (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Kill Railroad Bridge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Winona, MN

Hi, There actually were two swing bridges into Winona, which may be confusing. Only the ex-C&NW one has an article yet, which you recently renamed (yay) see: https://bridgehunter.com/mn/winona/bh46138/ That bridge hooked into milepost 0.0 in downtown Winona. The milepost actually was on the curve past the station. It should not be linked at the end of the Winona Sub template. That was the Green Bay and Western Swing bridge, which does not yet have a Wikipedia article: https://bridgehunter.com/mn/winona/bh46139/ thanks, Group29 (talk) 23:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Group29:

Fixed. Useddenim (talk) 23:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spain rail transport color templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Spain rail transport color templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:44, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metra System Map error

I just wanted to say that the 45° curves you implemented look fantastic, but the formatting overwrote the Grand/Cicero station icon (top half near the middle.) I tried fixing it myself but it kept breaking everything else so I thought I would let you know instead. I did not notice any other errors. Take care! Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed – I guess I hit Publish changes before I was quite done. Useddenim (talk) 02:13, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYCS station

Template:NYCS station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Cards84664 23:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Linha de Évora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casa Branca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - My version of Williamstown line

Thanks for the help cleaning up the icons on my version of User:ThylacineHunter/Lines/Williamstown railway line, although I'm not 100% happy with the red South Kensington-West Footscray line now looking like it branches away before South Kensington station. I may try extending it 1 row and using a similar curve as you did above North Melbourne station (as it also rejoins that line) when I get a chance to sit down at a pc later today. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 19:46, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metra System edit - awaiting feedback

Moved to Template talk:Metra System

16:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Thirteenth First Edit Day!

Hey, Useddenim. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: Thank you! This was just the sort of pick-me-up that I needed following Winter Storm Elliott. Useddenim (talk) 00:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Metrod

Template:Metrod has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 12:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BSicon-CPIC

Template:BSicon-CPIC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template for Ogilvie Transportation Center

Hello, after seeing the TLC you gave the McCormick Place station diagram, I have decided to work on diagrams for the other Metra stations (which for the most part should be really simple,) but have regrettably thrown myself in the deep end and have been working on Ogilvie Transportation Center, one of the downtown termini. I am really close to done with the basics (I will add roads, crossing lines, and corners later on), but wanted to be sure that my work is accurate and being done the right way. Everything I have started can be found on my user sandbox if you would not mind taking a look. I would really appreciate it, since having all of the switches so close together has caused me some confusion. With that being said, everything at and above the building icon (interlocking tower) should already be accurate. Thank you for your contributions! Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotdog with ketchup: I don't think it's necessary to color code the lines on the individual station diagrams. Useddenim (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:StnlnkR

Template:StnlnkR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:South Ferry RDT

Template:South Ferry RDT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One of yours

I haven't found a place to use this one, Template:L&NWR Lines in Liverpool (1846), but it is useful. Rather run it by you. This is among the very last unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan: Good question; Edge Hill railway station is the closest to appropriate I could find. Useddenim (talk) 03:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and requests

Thanks for your edits on Template:Chittagong–Cox's Bazar line. I am writing articles about railways in Bangladesh and for that I have to create and edit railway templates. Recently I created two templates for Dhaka Metro Rail (they are Template:Dhaka Metro line 6 and Template:Dhaka Metro line 1). Can you please make necessary edits in the templates? Another request, if you see the templates you will notice that Kamalapur railway station will have three metro railway lines. The station is under Template:Narayanganj–Bahadurabad Ghat line. Can you please add and connect metro lines here also? Mehedi Abedin 06:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehediabedin:

Done. Also, please take a look at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 29 where some templates for railway lines of Bangladesh are being nominated for deletion. Useddenim (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nctds

Template:Nctds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Maxs

Template:Maxs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Craigieburn line template

I love the first lot of changes to the Craigieburn line template making it more streamlined, but I'm not sure that the reordered city loop section looks right. I understand why they were changed (km in order looks a little better) but the gap under Southern Cross now looks bad. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 15:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go and implement these other changes you have made to the other Metro service templates in the morning. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:IFT color

Template:IFT color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bogra–Sirajganj line

Can you edit this? I can't create it properly. Mehedi Abedin 13:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehediabedin:

Done. Useddenim (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Howrah–Barddhaman main line/sandbox

Hello, Useddenim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Howrah–Barddhaman main line/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Beaufort railway station DAB

Template:Beaufort railway station DAB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bhf

Template:Bhf has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change to editor layout?

Just a quick question, since you do a lot of work with editing BSicon templates. On my end, the live preview no longer shows up when making changes. I have to select "publish" then "show preview" each time to make sure I haven't screwed something up. What I'm wondering is…did they remove the live preview?? Or did my device reset settings? Because if this change is permanent, thanks I hate it. And I have already tried fiddling around with my settings to no avail.

I know this isn't exactly your field, but I thought if anyone knew a way around it, it would be you. Thanks. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't really help you with this as I always work in code edit mode, then refresh using the Show preview button. Useddenim (talk) 14:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New York City Police Department vehicles

Template:New York City Police Department vehicles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Arrow2

Template:Arrow2 has been nominated for merging with Template:Pfeil. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Can you please fix Template:Narayanganj–Laksam chord line? Mehedi Abedin 13:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with it? Useddenim (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BSdist

Template:BSdist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:15, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BS-KRZ

Template:BS-KRZ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BSright

Template:BSright has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Armadale-Thornlie Line

{{Armadale-Thornlie Line}} appears to duplicate (in scope) {{Armadale/Thornlie railway line map}} and I can't see that it was ever used. Do you have further plans for it? Mackensen (talk) 01:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago 'L' system (all time)

I noticed you’re making some improvements to the all time map in the sandbox. I was planning on colorizing the current map with present day lines (see here). Haven’t decided on what color to use for the Blue line and it closed previous lines yet due to the similarity of blue and uex.

I don’t know if it’s entirely necessary, but the stations on that map are carefully spaced according to distance from downtown with the west side lines (O'Hare, Humboldt, Lake, Garfield & Congress, and Douglas) having their distances matched with north or south distances (a station at 2800W is on the same row as a station at 2800N or 2800S). Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 20:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're colorizing, just use grey for defunct lines. And although I'm keeping cross-streets aligned left-right, there's no need to preserve distances north-south on a diagrammatic representation. Useddenim (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lost on Belmont: I think Template:Chicago "L" system (all time)/sandbox is ready for prime time. Useddenim (talk) 20:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great! (Although for some reason the California/Stock Yards row is showing up offset for me.)

I also see that you've changed the color of the Brown Line from brown to maroon and the Red Line to the standard color on Template:Brown Line (CTA). Can you explain that one to me? It making differentiating Brown from Purple extremely difficult on my screen and doesn't leave a clear color distinction between the Red Line and the UP North. Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 17:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

					Purple
					Violet
					Brown
					Maroon
					Red
					standard

I changed the Brown and Red lines because the color values for maroon and standard are closer to the CTA colors than the named brown and red are respectively:

Laramie is one of those "break the rules" situations: although technically correct that it's a closed Blue Line station, on the diagram looks as if the

(exlBHF sky) icon was placed on the wrong route, hence the use of

(eBHF exruby). Useddenim (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

–The edit to Laramie was my bad, and I did think of how it could be confusing to have a blue icon, but figured the viewer would visit the station page and see it was never a Pink Line station. I was thinking about changing it to something like

this, but

(eBHF exruby) is indeed more uniform.

–As for the coloring, I have to admit that the standard color fits red better, but perhaps it should be set red for the Brown Line template to avoid confusion with the Metra line (since all Metra lines are shown in the standard color on 'L' templates, and vice versa.)

–But for the color of the Brown Line, I have to say neither color seems to fit perfectly. I am almost tempted to propose a new darker brown color (mocha, ~~coffee,~~ chocolate, darkbrown, walnut?) but I do not think the need is strong enough for a serious discussion about it. But if a darker brown is ever supported, I would be happy to contribute and add icons to its set.

–Although I do prefer brown over maroon, maroon is closer and there is no maroon line to clash with it, so I suppose there is no reason to change it back. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 15:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotdog with ketchup:: since this diagram doesn't show anything other than el lines, it's not necessary to differentiate from Metra lines color-wise. However, I do agree with you about

(red) vs.

(standard) in Template:Brown Line (CTA). Useddenim (talk) 03:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even though maroon is closer in value to the CTA color, it’s my opinion that brown is the better color because it’s easier to see against the purple line and it’s also definitely “brown.”

As for Laramie, I think the way to go would be using a closed sky station with a ruby line overlaid. Lost on Belmont ^3200N_1000W (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]