User talk:FocusinJabotito

FocusinJabotito, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi FocusinJabotito! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Unexplained edit

What was your reason for this? Doktor Rotkod (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What was your reason for removing perfectly sourced content?--FocusinJabotito (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an answer to the question, and indicates that you did not read the edit summary I left. So I ask again: what was your reason for that edit? Doktor Rotkod (talk) 19:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's a mistery...--FocusinJabotito (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Your recent editing history at Kristallnacht shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jayjg ^(talk) 13:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. User:Jpgordon (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]