User talk:CowHouse

Welcome!

Hello, CowHouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Iambic Pentameter _{(talk / contribs)} 17:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A possible sockpuppet is vandalizing the Jimmy Dore page.

it's claiming that information showing Dore crazy viewpoints is slanderous, Slanderous is a term dore uses to defend himself against criticism, also the ip address traces back to Pasadena, which is where dore lives. http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/138.229.221.104 Jaydogg1994 (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is suspicious that the account has only edited the Jimmy Dore page, but I'm not sure that it's a sock-puppet account. Dore tends to prefer the term "smear", so I don't think it's him. Anyway, I've got the page on my watchlist so I'm happy to revert any vandalism.

I thought they might have been genuine about the source being misrepresented, but I re-worded it so it is essentially identical with the wording of the article. Whoever they are, it's clear they're going to continue vandalising the page unless it gets protected. I would protect the page if I was able but unfortunately I'm not a sysop.

By the way, your edit says "he later released a video". This is inaccurate since the video you cited is from April 2016 (so it is earlier, not later). CowHouse (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They removed my edits and told me I would get blocked if I tried again, I need your help. Jaydogg1994 (talk) 01:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of people on the talk page favoured removing it, and Wikipedia is very careful about BLP violations. There's nothing I can do. Ultimately, there's more important things to worry about. CowHouse (talk) 05:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Jaydogg1994 (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CowHouse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CowHouse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Little Saint James, U.S. Virgin Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mar a Lago

It's literally in the first paragraph in a ref still linked in the page. How is that not related? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.246.203 (talk) 01:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I never claimed it was not in the source, but the page is about the island. There are many things in that article that do not belong on that specific page. CowHouse (talk) 09:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What happened on the island originated from there, though, so there is a connection.