User talk:Ltyl

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Ltyl, good luck, and have fun. — Newslinger talk 14:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Ltyl, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 14:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably be aware of this

[1] - I have already provided the other editor involved here with a very detailed caution about WP:NPA and they... didn't seem to listen. If this continues, you might want to consider WP:AN/I. Simonm223 (talk) 16:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I see you're already aware. Anyway rather than trying to shoe-horn the other editor I'd suggest sticking to WP policy related statements and if they proceed with personal attacks, they've been warned. Twice. Simonm223 (talk) 16:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This particular user has a history of WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour on the dutch Wikipedia project too [2] Simonm223 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community defense

This wasn't appropriate for article talk so I'm taking it here. The concept of community defense as being morally analogous to self-defense comes from a collectivist perspective on the concept of defense. Leftists often see "self-defense" being given special significance over community defense as a concept of toxic individualism. Protection of others, particularly those people who would be your colleagues, collaborators or comrades is a central revolutionary leftist virtue. As such, I'd be hypocritical if I suggested that community defense was not a morally justifiable reason for violence. However community defense generally depends on the presence of a threat to the community; and it strains credibility to claim that journalists from the mainland traveling alone constitute such. Simonm223 (talk) 15:39, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Simonm223: Interesting concepts. In particular regarding the root of self-defense is individualism.. Would never have made that connection if wasn't told. I can see there are situations where community defense is morally justifiable. I suspect the concept is used in some way in some legal systems even if not formally codified, for example in China when judges adjudicate the fights between different villages. Although I am not sure where to draw the line at the moment. In HK where the legal system can mostly be trusted, I would think it's harder to justify. Thanks for sharing. Ltyl (talk) 16:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's a reason why on issues related to China, where I am largely strongest in knowledge (I speak Mandarin, have family in China, have a large circle of Chinese friends and am very well versed in Chinese literature, philosophy and history) I am more deliberately and carefully neutral. Simple and China don't coexist. LOL Simonm223 (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Simonm223: Kudos to you! I can't say I'm good in those things myself even though I was born in China :-). I have lived in USA and UK in the past 20 years or so. I would say I have seen a little bit of both although it's a shame that I have never chosen a topic and delved deep into it (well except for what I have to do for work). That's very true - simple and China don't coexist. That's why it's so important to be neutral. Unfortunately a lot of people equal balanced reporting with assigning blames. Ltyl (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that rarely leads to neutrality. Simonm223 (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Criticism of the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticism of the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CataracticPlanets (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Matthew hk (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]