Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Chisté

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:24, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora Chisté

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With just 5 passing press mentions on Google News, she clearly fails WP:NBIO. Also the article is somewhat promotional. Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:51, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:51, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search yielded no signifant coverage on Aurora Chisté, just primary sources or closely related promotional material. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 02:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.