User talk:RachaelMHa

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

RachaelMHa (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (I work for The Channel, give OUT Day Australia is a project of The Channel.)

RachaelMHa (talk) 05:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Give OUT day has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Give OUT day. Thanks! Otr500 (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and thanks for your contribution. I would like to make a few points. I generally refrain from approving articles with a conflict of interest and especially concerning paid contributions. I feel advertising dollars contribute bias and as a long time volunteer am 100% against it. Even if you do not directly receive compensation for getting an article created you would still be considered a defacto paid contributor. You get paid to work by the company sponsoring the "event". Some see this as paid contributing over just a simple COI.

It may be considered WP:TOO SOON and some could successfully argue that creation in advance of April 18 2019, would be promotional. It could also be successfully argued that you are so far considered a single purpose account and these things weigh in heavy at AFD's. I hope you would find that contributing to Wikipedia a worthwhile and noble endeavor but I don't have a crystal ball. I assume you are in Australia and this is a big area always needing new editors. Your involvement may be minimal and I am supportive of charities even if I do not champion a cause. I would be more receptive to creation after the above date if the article is further declined or rejected. Another editor may see things differently so I left that open. I would not want any bias I have to create a stumbling block on an article that otherwise can have merit. For transparency I will add a note to the draft. Thanks, Otr500 (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Give OUT day (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Of the only sources that appear independent, the HuffPost article is by "Roger Doughty, Contributor President, Horizons Foundation" who run Give OUT day; and the Washington Blade and Autostraddle articles are not independent enough to demonstrate notability. All the other sources appear to be primary sources and thus add nothing to the subject's claim of notability. Can you find one properly independent and reliable source?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Give OUT day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Give OUT day, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 07:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RachaelMHa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 07:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Give OUT day concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Give OUT day, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]