Talk:Collision avoidance system

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Systems B‑class Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Control theory.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Technology C‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Stanlejk (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Stanlejk.

Source for Advanced Emergency Braking System Algorithm

This source explains how it can work: https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/22/files/22ESV-000290.pdf

Source for Regulation of AEB system

It looks like this article does deal too much with Regulation of AEB system.

Here there is one source which provide piece of information on non standardisation and regulation of the AEB, by EuroNCAP and ISO.

https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/proceedings/24/files/24ESV-000395.PDF — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.67.188.170 (talk) 21:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

There is no information here about criticism, or accidents caused by collision avoidance system (e.g. car brakes unexpectedly due to collision avoidance system, then gets rear-ended by the next car whose driver was taken by surprise). I would add such info if I knew where to look... I was actually hoping to find it here. 165.225.38.84 (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is some difference between criticism, or accidents caused by collision avoidance system.

In your example, I assume that if the next car whose driver was taken by surprise crash in the leading car, it is the fault from next car's driver and not the one of the leading car which has a right to brake!?
Critics exist, for instance against Nissan: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tanyamohn/2019/03/29/2017-2018-nissan-rogue-automatic-emergency-braking-presents-unreasonable-risk-safety-group-says/#6fd7810676c3
Specifically there is one case which present a risk of accident: "driving over a train crossing, the car just stopped. Luckily I was able to get it moving before a train came. Very scary!" No fatalities in this case, compared to 37,806 US fatalities without AEB in 2016 (See Motor vehicle fatality rate in U.S. by year) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.193.104.149 (talk) 20:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

source: https://www.carcomplaints.com/Nissan/Rogue/2018/investigations/

Might be the ESS could avoid the rear end?

This article does not deal with collision avoidance system : Rename?

This article does not deal with collision avoidance system but with collision avoidance system in automobiles. Collision avoidance system is an expression used for aircrafts with Traffic collision avoidance system and Airborne collision avoidance system.

This Collision avoidance system is not a good name for automobile. I suggest the titles collision avoidance system in automobiles.

This article does not deal mainly with collision avoidance system but with AEB. I suggest to rename it as AEB, with a specific section for collision avoidance system if needed. I beleive the AEB name is better, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.154.64 (talk) 11:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest automobiles Collision avoidance system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.154.64 (talk) 12:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

collision avoidance system vs AEB: Are there any other CAS than AEB?

Are there any other CAS than AEB? Could we say that CAS is a few regulated not well defined open concept while AEB is a standardized concept following defined regulations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.154.64 (talk) 12:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]