Jump to content

Talk:Pseudorandom binary sequence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vort (talk | contribs) at 15:58, 2 November 2019 (→‎Generator example: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconComputing Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputer science Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Talk

"Pseudorandom binary sequence" should be written as "Pseudo-random binary sequence", because of hyphen rules! Greetings. (13.01.2010)

"value of an aj element is independent of the values of any of the other elements" Wouldn't "uncorrelated" be more apropriate than "independant" ? Olivier.rieux (talk) 14:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please change the example in C to something more understandable. Is there a convention in Wikipedia about what to use to represent algorithms - in times gone by something like Pascal (called pseudo-Pascal) was used because it's almost the most readable code, whereas C is one of the worst. Robertpaynter (talk) 11:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible

The author appears to be confused about the distinction between "introduction" and "hairy details". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.234.224.230 (talk) 01:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Generator example

C code, which is included in article can confuse readers. It prints generator's internal states instead of generated bits. — Vort (talk) 15:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]