Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Line (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the Line

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional event failing WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Quite well referenced, but it's pretty much PRIMARY all mentions in passing. Could be redirected to Earth-Minbari War but that is not going to outlast it much, perhaps Babylon 5: In the Beginning movie might be a valid target...? In either case, this is not notable enough to be more than a redirect, I am afraid. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Extreme fictional minutia. Fails GNG and title is fairly vague._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, maybe merge the sourced real-world material to Jeffrey Sinclair where it's relevant for real-world context. I agree that Earth–Minbari War as the most suitable redirection target would not survive AfD either. – sgeureka ^t•c 09:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable. The reception is trivial. TTN (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.