Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Lalbhai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Sanjay Lalbhai

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sanjay Lalbhai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Indian businessman comes with a lot of references (half of them doubled up under slightly different titles), but it appears that there is only one that might pass for "independent, in-depth, third-party coverage": [1] - and that's Forbes, so probably paid for. Outside of that we have listicles [2], a two-part promotional "diary" [3][4], and plenty of board membership press releases. This does not seem to add up to sufficient personal coverage of acceptable quality. Suggest redirect to Arvind (company). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

• Delete or Redirect to Arvind (company) - Recently created by a single-purpose editor, who has all the hallmarks of an undisclosed CoI. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - article about a run of the mill businessperson written by an SPA in promotional style, with a single source that is reliable and in-depth. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
• delete just another business person that exists, and can be verified. But the subject doesnt have significant coverage, thus fails WP:GNG. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.