Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Schweinbeck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Schweinbeck

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable persons, failed WP:GNG Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 06:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable person in advertising.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The editor November 29th added a paragraph that was promotional and advertising in reading. I deleted that paragraph & added more sources regarding her notability. Deletion of this page is not recommended. Gwalkerone (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems like a person who does her job without standing out. Geschichte (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Entirely non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 15:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG, possible promo piece. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 04:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.