User talk:Lbecque

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome!--WillMak050389 19:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ibmser1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ibmser1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Jeh. Your recent edit to the page Ohm's law appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
As I explained in my edit summary, the article was correct as written; you appear to have it backwards. In fact the Coulomb (read the article) is a simple quantity of charge equivalent to about 6.2 x 10¹⁸ unit charges. The ampere is a rate of flow of charge, equal to one coulomb/second. The notation on the Coulumb page, indicating that the Coulomb equals 1 A • 1 sec, means 1 Ampere of flow FOR 1 second. Not 1 A PER second. (The latter would be indicated by a slash, the division sign, in place of the dot, which denotes multiplication.) Hope this helps. Jeh (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your right Jeh I was confusing PER second with FOR second.

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Lbecque, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 12:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Bookmarks

Hi Lbecque, are you affiliated with Online Bookmark IncSearch? I've included some more information below about Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline.

Also, please note that Wikipedia articles are required to be verifiable, which means that all article content must be cited to reliable sources that support the text. Content that is not cited to reliable sources is considered original research, and should be removed. I've removed several sections of the Google Bookmarks article for this reason. — Newslinger talk 12:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Newslinger, I am NOT affiliated with Online Bookmark IncSearch in any way. I am simply an experienced user of the product. --Lbecque (talk) 05:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Lbecque. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Google Bookmarks, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 12:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]