User talk:Salviati64

Advice

Please refrain from your caustic unproductive sarcasm. If it continues, you may be reported to admins.--Jeffro77 (talk) 04:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn’t expect any less. Please desist from vandalising my talk page with your unsubstantial whining. IC (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Roxy the dog. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 16:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it does deter User talk:Roxy the dog from ignorant drive by editing. He should know better. And he has broad shoulders, he doesn't need you protecting him from big scary words. Stay on point PaleoNeonate. Stop the condescention, just edit. If you had, you wouldn't have had to protect User talk:Roxy the dog --IC (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Salviati64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read through block policy, what is this for? Does rigorous discussion now account for a personal attack? No warning? Just censure? IC (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Read through block policy, what is this for? Does rigorous discussion now account for a personal attack? No warning? Just censure? [[User:Salviati64|IC]] ([[User talk:Salviati64#top|talk]]) 19:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Read through block policy, what is this for? Does rigorous discussion now account for a personal attack? No warning? Just censure? [[User:Salviati64|IC]] ([[User talk:Salviati64#top|talk]]) 19:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Read through block policy, what is this for? Does rigorous discussion now account for a personal attack? No warning? Just censure? [[User:Salviati64|IC]] ([[User talk:Salviati64#top|talk]]) 19:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}