Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Caplan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Caplan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It appears this article was created March 2019 from only college scandal news, rather than encyclopedic notability about him. Further research does not come up with particularly notable - appears he is only known for the college scandal. Seems like this is undue weight about a crime in this article, and his involvement is sufficiently covered in the main 2019 college admissions bribery scandal page. Gentry862 (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete known only in connection with a crime which is not big enough to merit articles on all those charged.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reason why he should have an article, Not notable. - MA Javadi (talk) 22:05, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E, the article is about as WP:UNDUE as one can get. -kyykaarme (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.