Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi V. Melwani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t 桜 c) 08:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi V. Melwani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This page should be deleted as the subject is not notable and seems like he himself edits and adds to the page.Tabletop123 (talk) 11:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject is not notable and the previous edits seem to have been executed by someone close to the subject. Syriusa (talk) 09:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No references thus doesn't meet the WP:GNG. Angus1986 (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ No references and not notable. Name search reveals not very pleasant complaints and stories. Tabletop123 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:36, 11 February 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]
- What's this – vote early and vote often? I'm striking this "bonus" vote. You already voted when you nominated the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - NinjaRobotPirate the deletion procedure is not a vote process and yes anyone is free to comment as many times as he/she wants to, including the nominator. Tabletop123 (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - You can comment, but you can't vote multiple times. As I said: your nomination is your vote, so please don't add further votes. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Was not correctly listed until today, so this should expect to run a minimum of a further 7 days barring WP:SNOW
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ mazca ^talk 19:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG PenulisHantu (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The subject also appear to use the name "Atman in Ravi". AllyD (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't have significant coverage or achievements to become notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. - The9Man | (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The links which were in this article prior to its nomination were obviously not suitable references. Looking for better, I am finding in-role mentions (for example around an endowed hospital) plus multiple PR-sourced items publicising his books, but I don't see these as sufficient to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 12:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.