Jump to content

Talk:Baguadao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 151.67.118.205 (talk) at 17:11, 13 March 2020 (→‎some reference of Baguajiao name). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconChina Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligion Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Baguadao or Baguajiao

the name of this entry is wrong, in fact there are no sources reporting this name in reference to eight trigrams teaching. The related Chinese voice only quotes "baguajiao" , furthermore also in the column beside the same entry in English does not present "baguadao" among the sect names. the title should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.118.205 (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

some reference of Baguajiao name

“Daojiao yu Qingdai Baguajiao”道教與清代八卦教 (translation: Daoism and Baguajiao during the Qing). “Qingdai Baguajiao”清代八卦教 (translation: Baguajiao during the Qing), writing by Ma Xisha.

change

I not understand. this voice is terrible. It is possible that it cannot be changed. It questions any credibility of an encyclopedia itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.118.205 (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]