Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Vigna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Buidhe (talk | contribs) at 04:55, 24 March 2020 (Judith Vigna: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 04:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Vigna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Web hits amount to a few mocking blog posts and a couple of brief mentions in articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To give editors a chance to evaluate PamD's findings and changes, as the pro-delete comments came prior to that.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 05:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 06:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.