Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubuntu Satanic Edition

Ubuntu Satanic Edition

Just a desktop theme, no more notable than anything on freshmeat. Twinxor t 04:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think this desktop theme is notable enough. TSO1D 04:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under A7. NN web content. Pop Secret 05:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:SOFTWARE. Wouldn't qualify as web content, I don't think. MER-C 05:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails both WP:SOFTWARE and WP:WEB. SkierRMH,07:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't think specific desktop themes are notable. JIP | Talk 11:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it's a desktop theme as of right now, but it will become a distro of its own later. It's a new project, give it some time. EliasAlucard|Talk 16:28, 15 Dec, 2006 (UTC)
- Things that might become notable in the future are rarely appropriate at the moment; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If it becomes notable, the article can always be recreated then. --ais523 15:35, 15 December 2006 (U T C)
Delete It's just a desktop theme that's wandering around on the net. Though I agree that if it becomes a distro it should be recreated.--Jonnylinuxnerd 16:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It depends on its userbase and unique features, of course, but I wonder what would be notable about such a distro. Right now, I could distribute a version of Ubuntu with this desktop theme included, but it not seem to be significant. Twinxor t 23:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SOFTWARE. Dragomiloff 22:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep See if it evoles to be a good article, it's unfair to delete something based on a stub. This has gotten alot of attention in it's lifespan, and is certainly noticeable. And it may "only be a theme" on the site, but that's because there's nowhere to host a 666Mb file, so donations are being taken for a server, etc. It's not doing anyone any harm, it should stay. Matt 01:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, there's no evidence of a significant community or notable features in the distro. Twinxor t 09:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SOFTWARE. Doczilla 01:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it seems tp be popular within the Ubuntu comunity, and it's still a stub. - CchristianTehWazzit
Delete It isn't notable right now. Maybe it will be at some point in the future, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. —ShadowHalo 03:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in oppose to Ubuntu Christian Edition. Duality is what Wikipedia needs for a better NPOV. --Ragnarok Addict 15:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This smells strongly of censorship on religious grounds. The fact that it's very existence has generated this much debate justifies it's inclusion