Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Leyes

Kevin Leyes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is lacking significant media mention in reliable source. Self profile link such as linkedin, forbes profile, YEC profile etc are used for citation. rest are non trivial mentions in reliable source. also the topic fails general notability guideline Below in the box (talk) 17:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't know if the nom here is a sock or not and I wouldn't have come across this article if the creator hadn't triggered a filter, but I would've nommed it myself had I come across it otherwise. There is no in-depth coverage of Leyes, all the pieces included in the article are passing mentions, interviews, self written or otherwise not coverage and I can find no better sources. Praxidicae (talk) 20:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Leyes has been discussed in multiple national Argentine print and digital media for example[1], [2], [3] and you still did not find in-depth coverage? Please check the Spanish references. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:ABF nomination from a SPA that has only 3 edits. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC) Retracting my comment because it is not on the content. I will post my reasons for keep again. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please clarify how ABF applies when the only comment here is only on content? Not to mention that I am clearly not an SPA and have pointed out policy specific reasons as to why it should be deleted? Praxidicae (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the article should be deleted then please nominate yourself. WP:ABF applies to the nominator only. It is sad that a "suspicious" SPA account can open a AfD and I have to prove why would a "new user" is not WP:ABF. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're missing the point. I don't need to nominate it, because it's already nominated. The intent of the nominator as far as I can tell isn't relevant. Feel free to refute the points I've made as they're based in policy. Praxidicae (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok! My bad. I retract my comment on WP:ABF. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - self promotion or paid promotion which signally fails WP:GNG. I too am curious about the nominator. A sock ? Or perhaps an regular IP editor who believes a user name will have more clout at an AfD. Whatever, it appears to be a good call. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GNG states If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.. Kevin Leys has received significant coverage in [4], [5], [6] which are reliable sources as well as independent of the subject. Hissamelriys (talk) 06:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]