Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky Mountain Animal Defense

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky Mountain Animal Defense

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~A worthy group, but I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 12 years. Boleyn (talk) 08:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

Comment: Boleyn, per this article it was "one of the most influential animal-rights groups in Colorado from 1994 to the mid-2000s." There are only a few articles about it online, but that appears to be because it was winding down as the internet age was winding up. On newspapers.com, by contrast, there are hundreds of articles about it (example), spanning 37 states and two countries. --Usernameunique (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable organization with RS WP:NEXIST. Denver Post, La Times, Environmental Magazine Wall Street Journal. I hope someone will add references to the article, but WP:NOTCLEANUP Lightburst (talk) 02:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NEXIST and sources mentioned above. — Toughpigs (talk) 04:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination per the convincing comments above. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 06:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.