Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanraj Nathwani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Premeditated Chaos (talk | contribs) at 09:15, 5 April 2020 (→‎Dhanraj Nathwani: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 09:15, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanraj Nathwani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman, being the vice president of a state-level cricket association is not notable and Who's who doesn't show notability per WP:BIO Akhiljaxxn (talk) 08:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

These References should be enough proof for notability of Dhanraj Nathwani, Kindly retain this article. - હમઝા ઘાંચી (Talk) 09:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
None of these seem to be the "significant coverage" required by WP:GNG / WP:BASIC. They are all stories that mention or quote him, none of them tell us anything substantial (other than his position) about him. One of them is a quote of him tweeting about a pigeon, how on earth does that prove anything? One detailed article specifically about him would carry more weight than the 10 passing mentions combined. Spike 'em (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.