Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King moe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

King moe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable rapper with little coverage from reputable sources James Richards 02:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. James Richards 02:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Delete per nom, no RS to be found. Caro7200 (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - All I can find are social media, the usual streaming services, and some promotional announcements that he submitted to magazines himself. No significant coverage in reliable sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.