Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistanis in Brunei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistanis in Brunei[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:11, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete As for Finland. This is a minor "X in Y" intersection based on it existing, rather than having had the attention paid to it which we require for notability. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 23:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I endorse the observation of the nominator Nannadeem (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence that the topic itself (as opposed to individual facts contained in the article) is notable. Cheers, 1292simon (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.