Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Heath (solicitor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Heath (solicitor)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Inappropriately sourced through just IMDB for many years. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it is high time we stopped allowing IMDb to be used as a source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SIGCOV and my standards. IMdB is not a reliable source, and not a relevant source for lawyers. He's done nothing notable as a lawyer. I've had at two pro-bono legal clients who have Wikipedia articles, and several friends/law school classmates with such articles. It's almost inevitable that an attorney will eventually represent a notable person. FWIW, when I was a college student, I met his one very famous client, who was quite nice IRL. Also, having an IMdB page is common; even my domestic partner has one because he produced a film. We are a charity, not a free web-host. Bearian (talk) 02:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sourcing and does not appear to have been particularly notable as an attorney. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.