Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Galianos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Galianos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor. Inappropriately sourced via just IMDB for more than a decade. Little hope for improvement with no secondary sources. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles, or exempted from having to have reliable sources to support Wikipedia articles, just because the article has a list of roles in it — even just getting an actor over NACTOR #1, the only notability criterion potentially in play here, still requires sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 00:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: The subject gets quite a decent write-up in The Gazette: here. She's had a couple of main roles, too, although the productions don't appear to be hugely notable. She might just meet the notability requirements. Dflaw4 (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bearcat. I don't think a single article in The Gazette cuts it. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.