Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desa (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Link 80. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 00:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Desa (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails WP:MUSIC. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~: their website's dead so I think it's safe to assume they're no longer working together, and there's no evidence that they made much of a dent while they were. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Found 2 RS, not enough. Caro7200 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they do have a staff written bio at AllMusic here] as well as two staff written album reviews which normally indicates that more coverage is available. Will do a full search tomorrow, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Found a lot of articles about them at Punk News, press the search button here, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that additional sources were presented later in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've gone through all the links in Punk News. They're either press releases, mentions of support slots or track listings for compilation albums, or interviews with former band members: these are all excluded per WP:BAND. I'm not convinced that the AllMusic sourcing amounts to coverage in "multiple, non-trivial, published works". ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Link 80: I'm not seeing coverage apart from the two AllMusic reviews[1][2]. Punknews does have a review, but that seems to be that reviewer's only review[3][4], and even if that were counted it's not reaching NBAND or GNG. The band is, however, a subsequent project of the members of Link 80, so WP:NBAND#6 does not be apply, but it would be reasonable to expand slightly on Desa (separate sub-section?) there using the three Allmusic refs and limited bits of passing coverage. That said, there may well be offline music magazine coverage due to the era. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 06:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Link 80 per Hydronium Hydroxide. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.