Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Broudy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Broudy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Unref article on recently deceased person. Succesful, but doesn't meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG.~~ Boleyn (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Hundreds of citations on several books and articles in what I believe to be a low citation field looks like a pass of WP:NPROF C1. That's supported by a volume of the Journal of Aesthetic Education that was dedicated to him. His books are widely held by libraries according to WorldCat, and I expect that he'll also pass WP:NAUTHOR. I've added two reviews so far. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per meeting WP:ANYBIO, WP:PROF, and WP:AUTHOR as explained above. Great example of WP:HEYMANN. This is a terrible nomination. The subject is not recently deceased as claimed above (died in 1998). I'm curious, did the nominator do a WP:BEFORE? His bio is included in multiple encyclopedias [1][2]. Google scholar [3] reveals his works are highly cited. TJMSmith (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I can only assume BEFORE was not done, since it's not hard to find refs like the ones I just reformatted ([4]) which clearly suggest he is notable, having had other scholars write articles about him. He clearly meets WP:PROF. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination per all above. Thanks for your hard work. Boleyn (talk) 06:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.