Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retired Enlisted Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:24, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Enlisted Association[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability . Long after the article was written, [1] appeared, but the scam isn;t notable enough for an article DGG ( talk ) 23:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 01:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 01:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.