Jump to content

User talk:RWNYC19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by JalenBarks (talk | contribs) at 04:22, 13 June 2020 (Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Reuven Wimmer. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reuven Wimmer (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RWNYC19! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting your article approved

[edit]

I saw the declination of your article. Let me offer some advice. Theroadislong rejected my first article, again and again, I felt that he was being unreasonable,too harsh, whereas it was myself that had the problem, low standards, more like not fully understanding the standards, but I heeded his advice, not without resistance and heel dragging and now that article is rated GA (Good article). Theroadislong might seem a harsh task master, you are not the only new editor that he has to deal with. He is an expert article reviewer, knows his stuff and, unbelievably, apparently is able to read through all of the verbiage and find deficiencies. Something I could never do. So heed his words and take corrective action and you will have your article. Also pay attention to conflict of interest, declare yourself. A recent approved article was actually written by the person herself. It started out like an autobiography, she finally declared her conflict of interest, and edited the article such that it was in the voice of wikipedia, the third person, with over 10 references in reliable sources. So it is possible to write an article about yourself, but it requires a lot of quality mentions, in reliable secondary sources, suppression of the ego and a lot of hard work. Best wishes. Suggest you checkout other biographies, like this one Elizabeth Rowe (flutist) There is also guidelines at WP:BLP Oldperson (talk) 16:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Reuven Wimmer has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Reuven Wimmer. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Reuven Wimmer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reuven Wimmer

[edit]

Hello, RWNYC19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reuven Wimmer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Jalen Folf (talk) 04:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]