Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onnig Cavoukian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Onnig Cavoukian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, portraits by Cavoukian are held in collections of National Portrait Gallery, London - here (4 portaits), University of Toronto Faculty of Music - here (2 portraits), University of Calgary - here (4 portraits). Coolabahapple (talk) 08:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the collections above, the stamps, and the sources I just added to the article. Theredproject (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and not notable - BeamAlexander (talk) 11:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The first reference listed here (which I have detailed a bit further, and linked) is a 2-page feature in the largest newspaper in the country. Some of the other references also appear to be significant, easily meeting GNG. WP:BEFORE failure - did User:Sportsfan 1234 and User:BeamAlexander25 read that Toronto Star article? Nfitz (talk) 01:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll note that the article is not available through the Star's website. I can access it through their Search print archives link which takes me to proquest, courtesy of the Toronto Public Library. It is non-trivial coverage of the subject. GNG is met. Keep. Vexations (talk) 10:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The sources added by other editors are great for verifiability and notability. Mysteryman blue 09:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.