Jump to content

User talk:Rickyar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 07:13, 25 June 2020 (Dating comment by Mainehaven - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

article "Red Skull" dispute with another user who keeps undoing edits Rickyar (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See below - RichT|C|E-Mail 18:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Red Skull. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 18:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You gave me a warning when he keeps undoing my contributions? Does that seem fair? Rickyar (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The other user received the same warning. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Red Skull edits

[edit]

Really? Messaging me seven years later about my Red Skull edits was uncalled-for. Your comments came across as somewhat condescending. I am a long time Marvel fan. I don't need to be educated about what retroactive continuity is. Marvel accepts retroactive continuity as canon and that was the basic stance I took with my edits. Look at current Marvel publications and you will find they state the first appearance of Johann Schmidt is Captain America #7. You have made clarifications/corrections to what I wrote and that is fine. No need to message me or anyone else about the edits you make. Mainehaven (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]