Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Avenue Creative (company)

The Avenue Creative (company)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another non notable organization failing to meet WP:ORG. The article reads as though it were a promo page for the organization. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Coverage by major publishers in that market means it must b relevant to several microcosms. Rare advert grammar in article can be removed instread of deleting --Eightnisan (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — The user above is the article creator & a sleeper account. Celestina007 (talk) 18:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS ^💬 11:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ORG & WP:ORGDEPTH and reads as an advertisement. Kaszper (talk) 15:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — I beg to differ based on wiki WP:RS. Rather than delete without vested interest, can't the article be improved upon? Eightnisan (talk) 23:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep primary sources Business Day and Punch secondary from source vangaurd ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Eightnisan (talk) 23:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eightnisan, you may not !vote keep more than once. Celestina007 (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007, no biggie! noticed your the UPE tag. You can delete the article or move to a talk space, oh and rest assured no one getting paid here despite what wiki admin tools reveal. Thinking I could appeal after reading your talk page but doesn't look like it.