Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric S. Pistorius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eric S. Pistorius

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This discussion has been included in the follwing discussions:
List of Politician-related deletion discussions, List of Illinois-related deletion discussions, and List of Law-related deletion discussions. Your input is appreciated.--Mpen320 (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Local politician that does not meet notability. Eric S. Pistorius does not appear to have ruled on any cases that meet Wikipedia:Notability from a Google News search. He is an elected judge whose constituency totals ~323,003 people. A map of the Circuit Courts in Illinois from the Illinois Blue Book 2019-2020 is here. This will be added to the politician and Illinois deletion sort lists. Mpen320 (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable judge. SportingFlyer T·C 18:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NPOL because state circuit court is a subprovincial level post. Doesn't seem to meet GNG either. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability under WP:USCJN. BD2412 T 03:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet WP:JUDGE. LefcentrerightDiscuss 22:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete judges at this level are almost never notable, nothing suggests Pistorius might be an exception to that rule. That said, I am still surprised my article on Denise Posse-Blanco Lindberg has survived.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being a judge at this level does not satisfy WP:JUDGE. Nika2020 (talk) 22:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing every single factor of my standards for notable lawyers. Bearian (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.