User talk:Adam9007
![]() | Notice:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Reply
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2019, the project has:
|
Content
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
Reverted edit
So what was wrong with my edit on Jelle's Marble Runs?The 2nd Red Guy (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- 1 You messed up (unintentionally I'm sure)
they also do stand-alone competitions around holidays with the marble names
. Adam9007 (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)- no i said {tquote|They also do stand-alone competitions around holidays with the marble names in the style of the holiday}} 16:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- You also somehow moved the t in 'they' to the beginning of the prose. The vast majority of those sorts of edits (at least from the ones I see) are test edits or disruptive edits from IPs or new accounts, so I just revert it all without looking at who did it. Sorry about that. Adam9007 (talk) 17:00, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- no i said {tquote|They also do stand-alone competitions around holidays with the marble names in the style of the holiday}} 16:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
John Kinsella (criminal)
What's the credible claim of significance on John Kinsella (criminal) ? Nick (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Nick, The cited sources do cover him (and his crime), and he seems to have many Google News hits, but I couldn't find evidence that he meets the strict criteria described by WP:CRIME. Adam9007 (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- You declined the A7 presumably because you believe there's a credible claim of significance, so I'm asking, what specifically on the article, when you reviewed it, was that credible claim of significance ? Nick (talk) 16:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand? It made the BBC News, and it's not just a one-off. Add: the IP also tagged Paul Massey (gangster), which was declined by someone else, and this article was reviewed by other experienced editors. Adam9007 (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not disputing what the sources say. I am asking what you believe the credible claim of significance is that makes the article ineligible for speedy deletion under criteria A7 (i.e, why did you contest/remove the speedy deletion template). I think, from what you've said, you're claiming if anybody is covered by BBC News, that's a credible claim of significance, even if such BBC News coverage is only demonstrated by a citation and there's no claim within the article itself. Nick (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unless there's something I'm missing, the sources seem to count towards WP:GNG. Are they reliable? Yes. Are they secondary? Yes. Are they third-party/independent? Yes. It is more than just a trivial mention? Yes. Adam9007 (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- And Autarch has added a source that describes the subject as an
influential figure
whosereputation went national
. Not sure how to fit that in the article though. Adam9007 (talk) 19:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not disputing what the sources say. I am asking what you believe the credible claim of significance is that makes the article ineligible for speedy deletion under criteria A7 (i.e, why did you contest/remove the speedy deletion template). I think, from what you've said, you're claiming if anybody is covered by BBC News, that's a credible claim of significance, even if such BBC News coverage is only demonstrated by a citation and there's no claim within the article itself. Nick (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand? It made the BBC News, and it's not just a one-off. Add: the IP also tagged Paul Massey (gangster), which was declined by someone else, and this article was reviewed by other experienced editors. Adam9007 (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- You declined the A7 presumably because you believe there's a credible claim of significance, so I'm asking, what specifically on the article, when you reviewed it, was that credible claim of significance ? Nick (talk) 16:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
where can i vandelize
can you tell me where can i vandelize — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- You can't. Adam9007 (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
how about in the sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- The sandbox is for editing tests. Vandalism there will be reverted like anywhere else. Adam9007 (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
what does this meam
what does You currently can not change pages on Wikipedia.
The ability to change pages has been removed from this account, IP address or IP address range by DannyS712. This block affects Andrew07111712. The following reason(s) were given for this block:
Vandalism
Your IP address is 2607:fea8:3da0:4ef:1923:c9d0:c472:3dee. This block has been set to finish on: infinite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's an IP address block. Adam9007 (talk) 20:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
A toast sandwich for you!
![]() |
Apologies for the edit on black supremacy - was just trying to standardize the leads and didn't realize there was a -very- recent discussion on the issue. Should have done a more thorough search, just didn't realize it was so contentious. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 15:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC) |
- @El cid, el campeador: Thanks. For what it's worth, I think both black supremacy and white supremacy should say racial supremacist, but there's a fat chance of that happening :(. Adam9007 (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treasure (South Korean band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Asexuality July 2020
Dear Adam9007 thank you for your message at my talk, but I would like to point you out that my edits falls under at least two exceptions of the three-revert rule:
- Removal of other content that is clearly illegal under U.S. law. AVEN actions constitute conspiracy to defraud.
- Removing contentious material that is [...] unsourced
In fact your, clearly affiliated with AVEN, account maybe removed from Wikipedia as any other account which violates Wikipedia content rules and policies. AceRebel (talk) 00:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- AceRebel, I am not in any way, shape, or form affiliated with AVEN.
AVEN actions constitute conspiracy to defraud
That's a very serious accusation, especially without any evidence to back it up! As for it being contentious, the policy is:Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to our biographies of living persons (BLP) policy
This is none of that.account maybe removed from Wikipedia
Accounts cannot be removed. They are needed for attribution purposes. Adam9007 (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)- User:Adam9007, your actions constitute disruptive editor behavior in particular:
- Cannot satisfy Wikipedia:Verifiability; fails to cite sources, cites unencyclopedic sources, misrepresents reliable sources, or manufactures original research.
Either you personally revert your own edit on Asexuality or I'm going to report you.AceRebel (talk) 00:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- How about you cease your disruptive editing, or I'll report you. Your edit was challenged; take your case to the talk page. Adam9007 (talk) 00:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)