Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Users Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Innovative Users Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this met WP:ORG or WP:GNG. An WP:ATD is to redirect, or merge and redirect, to Innovative Interfaces.

This article has been in CAT:NN for over 11 years, so I hope we can now find a resolution, one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The topic is already covered at Innovative Interfaces and I don’t see anything to indicate that this UG is notable in itself. Mccapra (talk) 09:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 14:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only self published sources. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.